· 9/17/2002
Jernigan v. Stuchell
Citations
- 304 F.3d 1030
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 19144
- 2002 WL 31058282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to respond to a grievance within the time limits contained in the grievance policy renders an administrative remedy unavailable
- holding that inmate that the doctrine of substantial compliance does not apply and the inmate must cure procedural deficiencies
- holding that inmate that the doctrine of substantial compliance does not apply and the inmate must cure procedural deficiencies
- holding prisoner failed to exhaust administrative remedies when he filed suit rather than attempting to cure a deficiency in his grievance submission
- finding that a prisoner who started but did not finish the grievance process was barred from pursuing a section 1983 claim
- holding an inmate who starts the grievance process but doesn’t complete it hasn’t properly exhausted his administrative remedies
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, McKAY, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.