Skip to main content
· 9/17/2002

Jernigan v. Stuchell

Citations

  • 304 F.3d 1030
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 19144
  • 2002 WL 31058282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to respond to a grievance within the time limits contained in the grievance policy renders an administrative remedy unavailable
  • holding that inmate that the doctrine of substantial compliance does not apply and the inmate must cure procedural deficiencies
  • holding that inmate that the doctrine of substantial compliance does not apply and the inmate must cure procedural deficiencies
  • holding prisoner failed to exhaust administrative remedies when he filed suit rather than attempting to cure a deficiency in his grievance submission
  • finding that a prisoner who started but did not finish the grievance process was barred from pursuing a section 1983 claim
  • holding an inmate who starts the grievance process but doesn’t complete it hasn’t properly exhausted his administrative remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, McKAY, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.