· 4/3/1917
Jernigan v. Cox
Citations
- 74 So. 736
- 15 Ala. App. 619
- 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 62
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- state could present direct conflicting evidence by its two expert witnesses on whether bullet wounds were entrance or exit wounds
- Plaintiff called defendant as a witness and defendant’s testimony was “strongly contradictory” of Plaintiff’s
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Samford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.