Skip to main content
· 4/3/1917

Jernigan v. Cox

Citations

  • 74 So. 736
  • 15 Ala. App. 619
  • 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 62

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • state could present direct conflicting evidence by its two expert witnesses on whether bullet wounds were entrance or exit wounds
  • Plaintiff called defendant as a witness and defendant’s testimony was “strongly contradictory” of Plaintiff’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Samford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.