Jerminique Weathers v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to enforce bargaining order in successive employer withdrawal of recognition case where Board failed to give a reasoned analysis
• remanding for a reasoned explanation of the appropriateness of a bargaining order
• refusing to enforce the Board’s order requiring a successor employer to bargain with a union because “the Board ha[d] not explained why an affirmative bargaining order—with its corresponding decertification bar—[was] the appropriate remedy in th[at] case”
• refusing to enforce the Board’s order requiring a successor employer to bargain with a union because “the Board ha[d] not explained why an affirmative bargaining order -- with its corresponding decertification bar -- [was] the appropriate remedy in th[at] case”
• “The decertification bar would last for a ‘reasonable period’—at least six months, perhaps as much as one year—during which time the employer and the union would presumably bargain.”
• separating out five factors set forth in Fall River

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).