Jermaine Facey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• record refuted the defendant’s allegation that counsel failed to “tell him anything” about the immigration consequences where, during the plea colloquy, the defendant acknowledged talking with counsel “thoroughly about the consequences”
• record refuted the defendant’s allegation that counsel failed to “tell him anything” about the immigration consequences where, during the plea colloquy, the defendant acknowledged talking with counsel “thoroughly about the consequences”
• “Third-degree grand theft does not appear to be an aggravated felony but may be a crime of moral turpitude which can result in removal if committed within five years of admission. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)©.” (emphasis added)
• record refuted the defendant’s allegation that he was prejudiced by counsel allegedly failing to advise him to consult an immigration attorney where the defendant signed a plea form which advised him that the plea “will” result in his deportation
• record refuted the defendant’s allegation that he was prejudiced by counsel allegedly failing to advise him to consult an immigration attorney where the defendant signed a plea form which advised him that the plea “will” result in his deportation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).