Jeremy Streeval v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “property must play more than some bit part in a scheme” and be more than “an incidental byproduct” to sustain a property fraud conviction
• clarifying the scope of the term “property” in the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and the federal program fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A)
• A scheme to defraud requires a lie “about the nature of the bargain itself.”
• considering whether the government's case evidenced bribery under Skilling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).