Skip to main content
· 6/16/2021

Jeremy Michael Juarez v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing in dictum that note—which was usurious in New York, but lawful in Texas—would be valid if it had been made and endorsed by Texas residents in New York, it had been made payable in Texas, and parties had contracted “with reference to the laws of Texas”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.