Jeremy Kent Lane v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding under Rule 3A:11 that a defendant who claimed surprise but did not request a recess or continuance “sought only suppression of the truth” and could not show prejudice
• holding under Rule 3A:11(b)(1), which governs discovery in criminal cases, that defendant who claimed surprise but failed to request a - 8 - recess or continuance sought \only suppression of the truth\ and could not show prejudice
• affirming admission of Commonwealth’s evidence despite non- disclosure after the defendant declined the offer of a continuance or to move for a mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).