· 4/9/2001
Jeremy Jason Mann, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. John A. Thalacker, Appellant/cross-Appellee
Citations
- 246 F.3d 1092
- 57 Fed. R. Serv. 51
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6016
- 2001 WL 336950
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a state supreme court's decision regarding that state's recusal statute \disposes of the question\ of \[w]hether [the] judge had a statutorily imposed obligation to recuse himself\
- “Being evasive and reluctant to talk is different from invoking one’s right to remain silent.”
- rejecting claim that confession was coerced \simply because [the suspect] was interro- gated on little sleep by an officer who used some leading questions and sometimes prodded [the suspect] to be more forthcoming\
- reversing district court’s grant of habeas relief and holding that judge’s sexual assault as a child did not make her unconstitutionally biased against defendant convicted of sexual assault
- reversing district court’s grant of habeas relief and holding that judge’s sexual assault as a child did not make her unconstitutionally biased against defendant convicted of sexual assault
- “[W]e are not persuaded that [defendant] was coerced into dictating and signing a detailed confession simply because he was interrogated on little sleep by an officer who used some leading questions and sometimes prodded him to be more forthcoming.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Arnold, Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.