Skip to main content
· 4/9/2001

Jeremy Jason Mann, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. John A. Thalacker, Appellant/cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 246 F.3d 1092
  • 57 Fed. R. Serv. 51
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6016
  • 2001 WL 336950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a state supreme court's decision regarding that state's recusal statute \disposes of the question\ of \[w]hether [the] judge had a statutorily imposed obligation to recuse himself\
  • “Being evasive and reluctant to talk is different from invoking one’s right to remain silent.”
  • rejecting claim that confession was coerced \simply because [the suspect] was interro- gated on little sleep by an officer who used some leading questions and sometimes prodded [the suspect] to be more forthcoming\
  • reversing district court’s grant of habeas relief and holding that judge’s sexual assault as a child did not make her unconstitutionally biased against defendant convicted of sexual assault
  • reversing district court’s grant of habeas relief and holding that judge’s sexual assault as a child did not make her unconstitutionally biased against defendant convicted of sexual assault
  • “[W]e are not persuaded that [defendant] was coerced into dictating and signing a detailed confession simply because he was interrogated on little sleep by an officer who used some leading questions and sometimes prodded him to be more forthcoming.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Arnold, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.