Skip to main content
· 7/17/2003

Jeremy Armstrong v. Daniel Bertrand, Warden

Citations

  • 336 F.3d 620
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14360
  • 2003 WL 21665695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an armed gunman did not regain the right to self-defense even though the victim threatened to kill the gunman and lunged for his gun
  • holding that a trial court is not required to give a jury instruction when there is no factual basis to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.