Jerell D. White v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[u]nder Ring [v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002),] and Hurst [v. Florida, 577 U.S. 92 (2016
• explaining that “[u]nder Ring [v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002),] and Hurst [v. Florida, 577 U.S. 92 (2016
• discussing Ring v. Arizona , 536 U.S. 584 , 612, 122 S.Ct. 2428 , 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002) (Scalia J., concurring)
• discussing reweighing of aggravating and mitigating circumstances after remand for Eddings error, which is not a “resentencing”
• “As a matter of state law, the reweighing proceeding in McKinney’s case occurred on collateral review.”
• “Under Ring [v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002),] and Hurst [v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).