Jere Fabick v. Tony Evers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “the agreement with its attached parking lot plan created an ambiguity allowing the trial court to consider parol evidence.”
• “[A]n interpretation which gives a reasonable meaning to all provisions [of a contract] is preferred to one which leaves a part useless or inexplicable.”
• “An interpretation which gives a reasonable meaning to all provisions ... is preferred to one which leaves a part useless or inexplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).