Jerald H. Miller, Jr. v. Tarrant County Appraisal District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mandamus is only appropriate where defendant owes petitioner “a clear nondiscretionary duty”
• noting that claimants who do not meet the ten-year requirement under the interim Labor invocation rules must submit affirmative proof of total disability, which would involve principally medical proof of disability
• holding that “the duty must be clear and undisputable”
• refusing to consider post enactment statements of key sponsor as those statements were not relied upon by legislators who enacted the law
• discussing, pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 606(b), juror-initiated telephone call and subsequent affidavit alleging intoxication of jurors during trial
• refusing to consider post enactment statements of key sponsor as those statements were not relied upon by legislators who enacted the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).