Jepson, Inc. And Ko Shin Electric and MacHinery Company, Ltd. v. Makita Corporation (F/k/a Makita Electric Works, Ltd.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding even to extent one or two statements defendant purportedly made may have contained misrepresentations, they were insufficient to establish pattern of racketeering RICO requires
• explaining that Rule 9(b) applies to allegations of fraud supporting RICO predicate acts
• concluding Rule 9(b) requirements should not have been relaxed because the plaintiffs had \as much access as the defendants to the customers who can flesh out the circumstances of the mailings and wire communications involved\
• concluding Rule 9(b) requirements should not have been relaxed because the plaintiffs had “as much access as the defendants to the customers who can flesh out the circumstances of the mailings and wire communications involved”
• “the plaintiff must, within reason, describe the time, place, and content of the mail and wire communications, and it must identify the parties to these communications”
• plaintiffs had “as much access as the defendants to the customers who can flesh out the circumstances of the mailings and wire communications involved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).