Jeppesen v. V.I. Pleasure Boats, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding district court’s decision to strike responses to movant’s statement of facts which “do not cite anything in support”
• upholding district court’s decision to strike additional facts which “significantly exceeded the 40-paragraph limit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).