Jentzen v. Pruter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “familiar rule that the right to foreclose and the right to redeem are reciprocal and that the right to redeem expires with the expiration of the right of foreclosure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Peterson v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-08-08· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Christmas v. Russell
  Supreme Court· 1866-12-26· cited 187×
• McGahey v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 121×
• Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1904-09-05· cited 68×
• Svanburg v. Fosseen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1899-01-25· cited 54×
• Niggeler v. Maurin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1885-08-14· cited 37×
• St. Paul Division No. 1 v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1866-01-15· cited 25×
• Fisk v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1877-08-13· cited 16×
• Steele v. Bond
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1881-09-21· cited 15×
• Robertson v. Corcoran
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1914-03-06· cited 15×
• Brasch v. Reeves
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1913-12-19· cited 13×
• Thompson v. Myrick
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1873-04-15· cited 8×
• Grannis v. Hitchcock
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1912-07-12· cited 6×