Jenson v. Toltec Ranch Co.
Citations
- 174 F. 86
- 98 C.C.A. 60
- 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5152
Syllabus
<p>1. CORPORATIONS (§ 399*) — PRINCIPAL AND ACENT — PRINCIPAL BOUND BY APPARENT Authority with Which It Clothes Its Officer or Agent.</p> <p>A corporation, like an individual, is bound to innocent third persons by the apparent authority with which it clothes its officer within the scope of his authority, and within the powers of the corporation to the same extent as by the actual power it confers upon him.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Corporations, Cent. Dig. §§ 1588, 1602-1GÍ0; Dec. Dig. § 399.*]</p> <p>2. Corporations (§ 425*) — Corporation Bound by Long Acquiescence in Like Acts op Oppicers or Agents.</p> <p>Where, without' challenge by the other officers or by the stockholders of the corporation, an officer has exercised a power within the general scope of his actual authority and within the powers of the corporation to do certain acts in its name and on its behalf for such a length of time as to justify others in believing that his acts and management were within his lawful powers and approved by the corporation, the stockholders and the corporation are alike estopped from denying, to the prejudice or injury of parties who have acted in reliance upon his apparent authority, that he had actual authority to do similar acts in its behalf.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For' other eases, see Corporations, Cent. Dig. § 1700; Dee. Dig. § 425.*] •</p> <p>3. Corporations (§ 425*) — Principal and Agent — Estoppel to Deny Op-picer’s Authority. •</p> <p>An-officer of a corporation, who was empowered to sell and convey its land without the signature of any other officer, in its name bought and sold land, borrowed money, and secured its repayment by the pledge of its personal property and a land contract, and conducted all the business of the corporation. for six years without protest or objection. He then ’ borrowed money of -a bank and secured its repayment by the conveyance of some of the land of the corporation.</p> <p>Sold, the corporation and its officers and stockho
Judges: Devanter, Munger, Sanborn, Wieetam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Central Republic Trust Co. v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court· 1941-09-15· cited 22×
- Ellis Canning Company v. BernsteinD. Colorado· 1972-09-29· cited 17×
- Galbraith v. First Nat. BankEighth Circuit· 1915-02-12· cited 12×
- Church v. HarnitSixth Circuit· 1929-11-06· cited 11×
- McCullough v. SmithEighth Circuit· 1917-06-20· cited 10×
- Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Eclipse Mach. Co.W.D. New York· 1916-07-14· cited 8×
- Union Indemnity Co. v. Home Trust Co.Eighth Circuit· 1933-04-13· cited 6×
- Manchester Mill & Elevator Co. v. StrongEighth Circuit· 1916-04-05· cited 3×
- Rusnak v. Commerce Trust Co.Seventh Circuit· 1920-10-05
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court· 1898-05-31· cited 189×
- Martin v. WebbSupreme Court· 1884-01-07· cited 172×
- Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court· 1874-05-18· cited 156×
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 128×
- Dunlop v. MercerEighth Circuit· 1907-10-31· cited 81×
- De La Vergne Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. German Savings InstitutionSupreme Court· 1899-10-30· cited 63×
- Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of BurlingameEighth Circuit· 1901-05-06· cited 52×
- Wright v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-06-08· cited 45×
- Park Hotel Co. v. Fourth Nat. Bank of St. LouisEighth Circuit· 1898-04-18· cited 35×
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Burlington & Southwestern Ry. Co.U.S. District Court· 1882-01-15· cited 23×
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BryantEighth Circuit· 1895-01-07· cited 22×
- First National Bank v. Dovetail Body & Gear Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1895-05-27· cited 20×
- Lincoln Sav. Bank & Safe-Deposit Co. v. AllenEighth Circuit· 1897-08-02· cited 18×
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court· 1897-06-17· cited 16×
- Hovey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1901-02-18· cited 10×
- Dysart v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1903-04-20· cited 9×
- Taylor v. North Star Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court· 1889-05-27· cited 5×
- Ingraham v. National Salt Co.Second Circuit· 1904-04-06· cited 4×
- In re S. P. Smith Lumber Co.N.D. Texas· 1904-09-22· cited 4×
- Waterbury v. McKinnonNinth Circuit· 1906-06-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.