Jensen v. Whitlow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Lakin’s state- ment that the noneconomic damages cap in that case inter- fered with the plaintiffs’ right to receive the full amount of compensatory damages awarded
• assuming, without deciding, that the plaintiff ’s injury was protected by Article I, section 10, “because the second step of the Smothers analytical framework is dispositive”
• noting Lakin’s state- ment that the noneconomic damages cap in that case inter- fered with the plaintiffs’ right to receive the full amount of compensatory damages awarded
• discussing substitution of state for individuals under the Oregon Tort Claims Act
• ‘In 1967, the legislature passed the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), which abrogated, in part, the state’s sovereign immunity.’
• “In 1967, the legislature passed the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), which abrogated, in part, the state’s sovereign immunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).