Jensen v. Quik International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the question of whether the plaintiff was entitled to rescission of the agreement due to violations of statutory requirements was arbitrable under the arbitration clause
• finding that the question of whether the plaintiff was entitled to rescission of the agreement due to violations of statutory requirements was arbitrable under the arbitration clause
• “[h]ad the legislature intended that a franchise agreement entered into in violation of sections 5 and 10 be unenforceable, it could have easily so provided”
• “Had the legislature intended that a franchise agreement entered into in violation of sections 5 and 10 be unenforceable, it could have easily so provided.”
• “Had the legislature intended that a franchise agreement entered into in violation of sections 5 and 10 be unenforceable, it could have easily so provided.”
• statutory compliance with disclosure requirement was not “condition precedent” to contract formation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).