Skip to main content
· 3/22/2010

Jensen v. Quality Loan Service Corp.

Citations

  • 702 F. Supp. 2d 1183
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26647
  • 2010 WL 1136005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “resolution of [the plaintiff’s] quiet title claim will necessarily determine ‘who owns [the plaintiff’s] Subject property’” making the declaratory relief claim “entirely duplicative” of the plaintiff’s other claims
  • dismissing separate “declaratory relief claim [as] entirely duplicative of [the plaintiff’s] other claims” because the “resolution of [the plaintiff’s] quiet title claim will necessarily determine who owns [the plaintiff’s] Subject property”
  • “A request for 2 injunctive relief by itself does not state a cause of action.”
  • “A request for injunctive relief by 23 itself does not state a cause of action.”
  • “A request for injunctive relief by 23 itself does not state a cause of action.”
  • “[C]ourts have considered the ‘occurrence of the violation’ [of RESPA’s kickback provision] as the date the loan closed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oliver W. Wanger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.