Jensen v. Pitman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that brief spikes in pipeline rates “are completely consistent with competition”
• price discrimination not practical because, “given the ease with which capacity can be transferred between shippers, resellers would have no way to prevent arbitrage”
• “[I]f there have so far been any applications of the [agency]’s policy, neither side has seen fit to bring it to our attention. So there is no basis here for any claim that the [agency] has actually treated the policy with the de facto inflexibility of a binding norm.”
• “[I]f there have so far been any applications of the [agency]’s policy, neither side has seen fit to bring it to our attention. So there is no basis here for any claim that the [agency] has actually treated the policy with the de facto inflexibility of a binding norm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).