Skip to main content

Jensen v. General Electric Co.

Citations

  • 623 N.E.2d 547
  • 82 N.Y.2d 77
  • 603 N.Y.S.2d 420
  • 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 3357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the legislature intended no continuing tort exception to the statute
  • concluding that the legislature intended no continuing tort exception to the statute
  • discussing the availability of damages when a plaintiff learned of continuing wrong outside of the period of limitations under N.Y.C.P.L.R. 214-c(2)
  • discussing the availability of damages when a plaintiff learned of continuing wrong • outside of the period of limitations under' N.Y.C.P.L.R. 214-c(2)
  • describing continuing-wrong exception as a “narrow common-law exception” to the general accrual rule
  • “the reasonable interpretation of the present statute, from the Legislature’s words and actions, is that it intended no continuing-wrong exception to its new comprehensive, across-the-board rules”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaye and Judges Titone and Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Jensen v. General Electric Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.