Jensen v. Barlas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “assertions that the counterclaims were asserted primarily to harass and humiliate [the plaintiff were] insufficient, as a matter of law, to sustain her abuse-of-process claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).