Skip to main content
· 5/9/2001

Jennison v. Providence St. Vincent Medical Center

Citations

  • 25 P.3d 358
  • 174 Or. App. 219
  • 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that it was reasonable for the patient to assume that the radiologist was a hospital employee where nowhere on the consent form did it indicate that the radiologists were independent contractors
  • stating that, “if the hospital undertakes to provide certain services to the public and there is no evidence indicating that the patient was aware of the physician’s nonemployee status, then the ‘holding out’ requirement of the doctrine is satisfied”
  • finding it was reasonable for the patient to assume -that the radiologist was a hospital employee where nowhere on the consent form did it indicate that radiologists were independent contractors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollheim, Kistler, Lipscomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.