Jennings v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 609(a)(2) makes evidence of a conviction automatically admissible[] without regard to the severity of the punishment or any resulting prejudice[.]”
• “Second Trial Motion in Limine Opinion”
• “Second Trial Motion in Limine Opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jennings v. Thompson
  District of Columbia· 2011-09-22
• Mattiaccio v. Dha Group, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2019-12-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Joseph R. Jackson
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-02-08· cited 154×
• United States v. Jesus Ortiz
  Second Circuit· 1977-04-11· cited 109×
• United States v. David T. Lewis
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-03-03· cited 97×
• United States v. Stephen Lee Galati
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-08-29· cited 67×
• Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-05-14· cited 62×
• Garland Lewis v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 1986-06-20· cited 19×
• Brundidge v. City of Buffalo
  W.D. New York· 1999-11-19· cited 11×

Other cases named Jennings v. Thompson

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Jennings v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1891-11-15· cited 3×
• Jennings v. Thompson
  District of Columbia· 2011-04-18· cited 2×
• Jennings v. Thompson
  District of Columbia· 2011-09-22
• Jennings v. Thompson
  District of Columbia· 2011-09-22
• Jennings v. Thompson
  District of Columbia· 2011-07-23
• Jennings v. Thompson
  District of Columbia· 2011-04-18
• Jennings v. Thompson
  High Court of American Samoa· 1994-12-07