Jennings v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “there is a presumption, in the absence of a strong showing to the contrary, that the trial judge sift[ed] the wheat from the chaff, ignor[ed] illegal evidence and considered] only legal evidence.” (citation, punctuation and emphasis omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mays v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-19· cited 18×
• Carroll v. Carroll
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-11-29· cited 3×
• In the Interest of V H.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-18· cited 1×
• In Re Vh
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-12-01· cited 743×
• Palmer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-04-06· cited 78×
• Fraser v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-02-06· cited 10×