Skip to main content
· 5/20/1968

Jennings v. Ruidoso Racing Association

Citations

  • 441 P.2d 42
  • 79 N.M. 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • writing related to employment extension contract must “sufficiently describe the duties which [the employee] was hired to perform and prescribe the salary he was to receive ”
  • quot-ing English Statute of Frauds and Perjuries (29 Charles II, C. 3)
  • minutes of meeting at which parties agreed to extend employee’s contract for one year “at his present rate of compensation” satisfies the statute of frauds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noble, Chavez, Carmody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.