Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The law is well 3 settled that in a personal injury action causation must be proven within a reasonable medical 4 probability based [on] competent expert testimony.”
• “[A]n expert’s conclusory opinion that some- thing did occur, when unaccompanied by a reasoned explana- tion illuminating how the expert employed his or her superior knowledge and training to connect the facts with the ultimate conclusion, does not assist the jury.”
• plaintiff must produce “evidence from 24 which reasonable [people] may conclude that it is more probable that the event was caused by the 25 defendant than it was not” (quoting Osborn v. Mem’l Blood Bank, 5 Cal. App. 4th 234, 253 26 (1992) (alterations in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).