Jennings v. McCormick
Citations
- 25 Wash. 427
- 65 P. 764
- 1901 Wash. LEXIS 410
Syllabus
<p>BREACH OF CONTRACT- — -LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.</p> <p>Where the owners of adjoining lands, which are protected against overflow from high tides hy means of dikes and dams, enter into an agreement whereby one of the owners contributes a sum of money toward the construction of a dam on the condition that certain dikes owned by the others are not to he cut, leveled, or damaged in any way, and in case they should be-such sum was to he refunded to him, such sum must he regarded as a stipulation for liquidated damages to which he would he entitled on the breach of the contract.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Madler v. SilverstoneWashington Supreme Court· 1909-10-04· cited 27×
- Smith v. Lambert Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1920-01-19· cited 13×
- Drumheller v. American Surety Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court· 1902-12-29· cited 13×
- Canady v. KnoxWashington Supreme Court· 1906-09-07· cited 9×
- Erickson v. GreenWashington Supreme Court· 1907-11-20· cited 8×
- Jenkins v. American Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1907-03-05· cited 6×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.