Jennings v. Hartford Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]here . . . no evidence has been presented to show that [an agency] acted in bad faith, the averments in the [agency’s] affidavits should be accepted as true”
• indicating that where no evidence has been presented to show the agency acted in bad faith, the averments in the agency’s affidavit should be accepted as true
• indicating that where no evidence has been presented to show that the agency acted in bad faith, the averments in the agency’s affidavit should be accepted as true
• quoting, in turn, Joe v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 782 A.2d 24, 33 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001)
• quoting, in turn, Joe v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 782 A.2d 24, 33 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001)
• generally, where “no evidence has been presented to show that [an agency] acted in bad faith, the averments in [that agency’s] affidavits should be accepted as true.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).