Jennings v. Gifford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the respondent’s coming into visual range of the petitioner’s daughter twice on one occasion while looking for her at her school did not satisfy requirement of “repeated and unwanted contact” in ORS 163.738(2)(a)(B)
• finding one physical contact that might support entry of an SPO but declining to decide whether it met the statutory standard because a single contact alone would not support issuance of an SPO
• telling the petitioner to “go to hell” over the phone did not constitute an unequivocal threat that instilled in the petitioner an objectively reasonable fear of imminent and serious personal violence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).