Jennings v. Emry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “conclusory allegations that various statutory provisions have been breached are of no consequence if unsupported by proper factual allegations”
• explaining that a complaint should be drafted with “clarity sufficient to avoid requiring a district court or opposing party to forever sift through its pages” in search of the claim alleged
• stating that a complaint “must be presented with clarity sufficient to avoid requiring a district court or opposing party to forever sift through its pages in search” of what the plaintiff claims
• “[I]n pleading predicate acts, conclusory allegations that various statutory provisions have been breached are of no consequence if unsupported by proper factual allegations.”
• “[I]n pleading predicate acts, conclusory allegations that various statutory provisions have been breached are of no consequence if unsupported by proper factual allegations.”
• a pleading must be presented “with clarity sufficient to avoid requiring a district court or opposing party to forever sift through its pages in search” of the pleader’s claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).