Jennings v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a factfinder must determine whether plaintiffs involvement in initial real-estate development proposal, which was not built, entitled plaintiff to a commission for completed second proposal, which involved plans similar to those for the initial proposal
• “If there is any evidence in the record from any source from which a reasonable inference in the nonmoving party’s favor may be drawn, the moving party simply cannot obtain a summary judgment.” (alterations and quotations marks omitted)
• “If there is any evidence in the record from any source from which a reasonable inference in the nonmoving party’s favor may be drawn, the moving party simply cannot obtain a summary judgment.” (alterations and quotations marks omitted)
• discussing quantum meruit and unjust enrichment together

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).