Skip to main content
· 9/20/1956

Jennings v. Autry

Citations

  • 94 S.E.2d 629
  • 94 Ga. App. 344
  • 1956 Ga. App. LEXIS 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after verdict, it is essential for the movant and his counsel to establish that neither knew or had reason to suspect a juror relationship they contend to be disqualifying
  • attorney presented no evidence showing why he suspected venireman was disqualified to serve

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carlisle, Gardner, Townsend

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.