Jennings ex rel. Jennings v. Schwab

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reconsidering the similarities of bad act evidence to determine probative value and, subsequently, comparing this probative value to the danger of unfair prejudice
• reconsidering the similarities of the prior bad act and the charged crime to ascertain total probative value and, subsequently, comparing this probative value to the danger of unfair prejudice
• “We are cognizant of the prejudicial effect of admitting evidence of [bad acts] based upon the degree of similarity with the charged crime.”
• weighing probative value against the danger of unfair prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).