Jennifer Nicole Compton v. Tammy Pfannenstiel and Timothy Reed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we consider evidence in light favorable to trial court’s ruling
• stating that we use statutory framework provided by Family Code to determine grandparent’s standing to intervene under section 102.004
• holding, as part of de novo review of standing under section 102.004, that we review entire record to determine if trial court’s implied findings are supported by any evidence
• stating that “satisfactory proof” in section 102.004(a) is proof by preponderance of evidence as facts existed when suit was filed
• considering “drug use, recent criminal arrests, and extreme neglect of her children during the preceding eight months”
• considering grandmother’s evidence of parent’s “drug use, recent criminal arrests, and extreme neglect of her children during the preceding eight months” as factors relevant to standing analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).