Jennifer Marie Treto v. Sandra Lilibeth Ortega Treto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that reliance is not necessarily essential to establishing causation under the CPA
• noting that Washington courts “generally enforce contract choice of law provisions”
• rejecting contention that courts do not need to look to extrinsic evidence to interpret standardized consumer contracts
• explaining what establishes a practice is unfair or deceptive 7 as a matter of law before turning to a causation analysis
• guoting Indoor Billboard/Wash., Inc. v. Integra Telecom of Wash., Inc., 162 Wn.2d 59, 82, 170 P.3d 10 (2007)
• “but for’’proximate causation applies to a CPA claim “based on an affirmative misrepresentation’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).