Jennifer Fowler v. Nicolas and Megan Whisenhunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the legislature is not “prohibited from ‘pass[ing] a law that directly impacts a case pending in Washington courts’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hr’gs Bd., 151 Wn.2d 568, 625, 90 P.3d 659 (2004))
• concluding that the legislature is not \prohibited from 'pass[ing] a law that directly impacts a case pending in Washington courts'\ (alteration in original) (quoting Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd., 151 Wn.2d 568, 625, 90 P.3d 659 (2004))
• declining to address additional issues on appeal when resolution of one issue effectively disposed of case.
• declining to “‘reach[] any other issues that might be presented’” because the “‘resolution of [the primary issue] effectively disposes of a case’”
• declining to address additional issues on appeal when resolution of one issue effectively disposed of case
• declining to address additional issues on appeal when resolution of one issue effectively disposed of case.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).