Jennifer Arculeo v. On-Site Sales & Marketing, LLC and Sanford Pankin, Also Known as Crystal Hills, Docket No. 04-3807 Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[the joint employer] doctrine is operative [where] an employee, formally employed by one entity, [] has been assigned to work in circumstances that justify the conclusion that the employee is at the same time constructively employed by another entity”
• noting in contrast that joint employers “are separate legal entities” that “handle certain aspects of their employer-employee relationship jointly” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• ‘Notwithstanding the same label and some core similarities between [single integrated employer and joint employer], the doctrines might differ significantly in different contexts.’
• describing the “well-established authority” that an employee “technically employed on the books of one entity” may hold “another entity” liable for certain employment violations if the two are part of a “single integrated employer”
• “[E]xamples [of a single employer include] separate corporations under common ownership and management . . . .”
• “An employer is not covered by the provisions of Title VII, unless the employer has at least fifteen employees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).