Skip to main content

Jenkins v. State

Citations

  • 8 A.3d 1147
  • 2010 Del. LEXIS 619
  • 2010 WL 4948566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony from a police officer with personal knowledge that defendant violated probation, among other things, was competent evidence
  • concluding that witness’ testimony “based on firsthand observations of which he had personal knowledge” was not hearsay
  • holding that defendant having actual notice of alleged violation of probation could not complain that he did not receive written notice
  • holding that defendant having actual notice of alleged violation of probation could not complain that he did not receive written notice
  • noting that the Delaware Supreme Court has not addressed whether the exclusionary rule should apply to violation of probation hearings
  • police officer’s testimony based on his firsthand observations of which he had personal knowledge was not hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Jacobs, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.