Jenkins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while it may be a factor that only appellant was included in both a photo array and a line-up identification, the procedure “would only be suggestive if there was some reason for [the witness] to notice it”
• merger is not under the required elements test because each crime has different elements, but under the rule of lenity because both crimes arose out of the same act of firing a handgun at the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jenkins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-12· cited 70×
• Nash v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-06-20· cited 28×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-07-03· cited 15×
• Morales v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-29· cited 8×
• Wallace v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-01· cited 7×
• Washington v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-06· cited 5×
• Cooch v. S & D River Island, LLC
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-27· cited 3×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-29· cited 3×
• Wallace v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27
• United States v. Garfield Redd
  Fourth Circuit· 2023-10-19