Skip to main content

Jenkins v. State

Citations

  • 522 S.E.2d 678
  • 240 Ga. App. 102
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1390
  • 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 1234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concerning “mere conclusory statements” and “meaningful argument” contemplated by Court of Appeals’ rules
  • “[m]ere conclusory statements . . . are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by” Court of Appeals Rule 27 (c) (2)
  • “Mere conclusory statements . . . are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated, by [Rule 27 (c) (2)]”
  • mere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by this court’s rules
  • mere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by this court’s rules
  • mere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by this court's rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Smith, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.