Skip to main content
· 10/1/1895

Jenkins v. McCarthy

Citations

  • 45 S.C. 278
  • 22 S.E. 883
  • 1895 S.C. LEXIS 34

Syllabus

<p>1. Nonsuit. — It was not error in Circuit-Judge to grant nonsuit in this case upon ground that there was no proof of negligence.</p> <p>2. Evidence. — In this case there is an utter absence of testimony to show the lack of proper means, or the want of proper care, in driving the piles in question.</p> <p>3. Peeading. — A plaintiff who sets up negligence solely in the manner of driving piles, will be confined to such issue, and cannot introduce evidence that the piles were not sufficiently driven.</p> <p>4. Ibid. — Evidence.—A party alleging a specific negligence cannot, after issue joined on that allegation, introduce evidence of any kind of negligence.</p>

Judges: Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.