Skip to main content
· 3/11/1993

Jenkins v. Karlton

Citations

  • 620 A.2d 894
  • 329 Md. 510
  • 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 769
  • 1993 Md. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Maryland law has long recognized that acknowledg[ ]ment of a debt barred by limitations removes the bar to pursuing the remedy.”
  • “Maryland law has long recognized that acknowledgment of a debt barred by limitations removes the bar to pursuing the remedy.”
  • parol evidence not admissible to inject a condition not apparent on the fact of a promissory note
  • under the objective law of contracts, Maryland courts seek to determine, from the language of the contract, what a reasonable person in the position of the parties would have meant
  • under the objective law of contracts, Maryland courts seek to determine, from the language of the contract, what a reasonable person in the position of the parties would have meant
  • “The statute of limitations does not extinguish the debt; it bars the remedy only. Thus, Maryland law has long recognized that acknowledgment of a debt barred by limitations removes the bar to pursuing the remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.