· 3/11/1993
Jenkins v. Karlton
Citations
- 620 A.2d 894
- 329 Md. 510
- 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 769
- 1993 Md. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Maryland law has long recognized that acknowledg[ ]ment of a debt barred by limitations removes the bar to pursuing the remedy.”
- “Maryland law has long recognized that acknowledgment of a debt barred by limitations removes the bar to pursuing the remedy.”
- parol evidence not admissible to inject a condition not apparent on the fact of a promissory note
- under the objective law of contracts, Maryland courts seek to determine, from the language of the contract, what a reasonable person in the position of the parties would have meant
- under the objective law of contracts, Maryland courts seek to determine, from the language of the contract, what a reasonable person in the position of the parties would have meant
- “The statute of limitations does not extinguish the debt; it bars the remedy only. Thus, Maryland law has long recognized that acknowledgment of a debt barred by limitations removes the bar to pursuing the remedy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.