Jenkins v. E. L. Long Motor Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the trial judge's ruling on the qualification of an expert would not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion
• recognizing that the trial judge’s ruling on the qualification of an expert would not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion
• stating that the trial court’s ruling on the qualification of an expert would not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion and prejudice to the complaining party
• affirming jury verdict against common carrier under State law for injuries sustained by motorist, despite shipper’s negligence in loading cargo
• a trial judge's ruling to exclude expert testimony will not be disturbed on appeal unless it appears an abuse of discretion has occurred
• a trial judge’s ruling to exclude expert testimony will not be disturbed on appeal unless it appears an abuse of discretion has occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).