Jenkins v. Department of Labor & Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that three enumerated findings were correctly included in the jury instructions because they did not attack Jenkins’s credibility or consist of opinions of the Board but rather were material to the ultimate issue
• stating the jury was not bound by the findings in this case if it found other evidence more persuasive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).