Jenkins v. Currier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that persons subject to criminal sanctions, such as incarcerated prisoners and parolees, have more limited Fourth Amendment rights than persons not subject to criminal sanctions
• holding that “[p]laintiffs alleging a violation of § 1983 must demonstrate they have been deprived of a right secured by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, and that the defendants deprived them of this right acting under color of law”
• “Appellant had no due process right to a hearing when he was taken back into custody to complete his previously imposed sentence.”
• “Appellant had no due process right-to a hearing when he was taken back into custody to complete his previously imposed sentence.”
• no violation of the Fourth Amendment when prisoner, after having been released from federal custody erroneously, was reseized to serve 1164 (C.D. Ill. 1992

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).