Jenkins v. Bartlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no genuine issue of material fact as to whether there was a constitutional violation and as to whether the municipality was deliberately indifferent
• finding no genuine issue of material fact on a failure to train claim because the plaintiff had not offered sufficient evidence that the city had actual or constructive knowledge of other constitutional violations
• “The jury found that Mr. Jenkins’ constitutional rights were not violated ..., thus the City cannot be held liable for any failure to train.”
• “[T]here can be no liability under Monell for failure to train when there has been no violation of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.”
• “[T]here can be no 14 liability under Monell for failure to train when there has been no violation of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.”
• “[T]here can be no liability under Monell for failure to train when there has been no violation of the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).