Skip to main content
· 1/21/1978

Jenkins v. Arnold

Citations

  • 573 P.2d 1013
  • 223 Kan. 298
  • 1978 Kan. LEXIS 225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing reckless indifference or inexcusable neglect from unintentional inadvertence or excusable neglect, the latter including failure of counsel to answer
  • Court upheld trial court’s denial of motion to set aside default judgment because though the defendant demonstrated excusable neglect, he failed to establish a meritorious defense.
  • \A litigant should not be unnecessarily penalized for the simple neglect of his agent or counsel.\
  • “[A] court should resolve any doubt in favor of the motion [to set aside the default] so that cases may be decided on their merits.”
  • “A litigant should not be unnecessarily penalized for the simple neglect of his agent or counsel.”
  • \[A] court should resolve any doubt in favor of the motion [to set aside a default judgment] so that cases may be decided on their merits.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.