Skip to main content
· 4/9/1998

Jenkins v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

Citations

  • 140 F.3d 1161
  • 49 Fed. R. Serv. 234
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6867
  • 1998 WL 162139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disqualification not required where judge's son had become a new associate at defendant's law firm
  • recusal not required where judge’s son was “a salaried associate who would not be substantially affected by the out‐ come”
  • recusal not required where judge’s son was “a salaried associate who would not be substantially affected by the out‐ come”
  • recusal not required where judge’s son was “a salaried associate who would not be substantially affected by the out‐ come”
  • denial of motion to recuse is reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • addressing liability for hazard posed by a lake

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Gibson, Nangle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.