· 4/9/1998
Jenkins v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.
Citations
- 140 F.3d 1161
- 49 Fed. R. Serv. 234
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6867
- 1998 WL 162139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disqualification not required where judge's son had become a new associate at defendant's law firm
- recusal not required where judge’s son was “a salaried associate who would not be substantially affected by the out‐ come”
- recusal not required where judge’s son was “a salaried associate who would not be substantially affected by the out‐ come”
- recusal not required where judge’s son was “a salaried associate who would not be substantially affected by the out‐ come”
- denial of motion to recuse is reviewed for abuse of discretion
- addressing liability for hazard posed by a lake
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Gibson, Nangle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.