Jenkie H. Bunn v. Joyce K. Conley, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding notification claim was unripe because the court did not know which warden would be notifying law enforcement
• holding that a prisoner’s challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 4042(b), which requires that the Bureau of Prisons notify a state’s chief law enforcement officer that a prisoner convicted of a crime of violence is being released, is not cognizable in habeas
• stating that courts 21 should not recharacterize nature of prisoner’s claim because PLRA and AEDPA created “pitfalls 22 of different kinds for prisoners using the wrong vehicle”
• discussing consequences that include a higher filing fee and the risk of receiving a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g)
• discussing consequences that include a higher filing fee and the risk of receiving a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g)
• discussing consequences that include a higher filing fee and the risk of receiving a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).